Trade Dress Protection and the Expanding Concept of Brand Identity in International Commerce
Main Article Content
Abstract
Modern businesses increasingly rely upon visual and sensory characteristics extending beyond conventional word and logo trademarks to distinguish their products and services in competitive markets. Product configuration, packaging, store layouts, color combinations, graphical presentation, and other elements of commercial appearance may collectively contribute to a recognizable brand identity. The legal protection of these characteristics, commonly associated with the concept of trade dress, presents complex questions concerning distinctiveness, functionality, consumer perception, and the appropriate boundaries of trademark protection. This article examines the development of trade dress protection and evaluates its relevance to contemporary international commerce. The analysis considers the circumstances in which non-traditional visual features may acquire sufficient distinctiveness to warrant legal protection and examines the evidentiary challenges involved in demonstrating consumer association. Particular attention is given to the functionality doctrine, which prevents trademark law from granting perpetual exclusive control over features that are primarily necessary for technical or competitive reasons. The article further considers the interaction between trade dress protection, design rights, copyright, and unfair competition law. Digital commerce has introduced additional complexities because consumers may encounter product appearances through online images, virtual stores, and social media before physically experiencing the product. Comparative analysis demonstrates substantial differences in the recognition and enforcement of trade dress across jurisdictions. The article argues that trade dress protection can provide an important supplement to conventional trademark law but should be applied cautiously to avoid transforming functional or commonplace design characteristics into perpetual monopolies. It proposes a contextual assessment based upon distinctiveness, consumer recognition, functionality, commercial context, and the availability of alternative designs.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.