Open-Source Software and Intellectual Property Law: Licensing Freedom, Commercialization and Compliance Challenges

Main Article Content

Dr. Jonathan W. Fairchild
Prof. Eliska M. Radovan

Abstract

Open-source software has become a fundamental component of the global technology ecosystem, supporting commercial applications, public infrastructure, research projects, and consumer products. Unlike conventional proprietary software, open-source projects are distributed under licenses that permit specified forms of use, modification, and redistribution subject to conditions established by the relevant licensing framework. Although these licenses promote collaboration and technological dissemination, their interaction with conventional intellectual property rights creates significant compliance and enforcement challenges. This article examines the intellectual property foundations of open-source software and evaluates the legal consequences of failing to comply with open-source licensing requirements. The article focuses primarily on copyright ownership, license conditions, derivative works, redistribution obligations, attribution requirements, and the distinction between permissive and reciprocal licensing models. Particular attention is given to commercial enterprises that incorporate open-source components into proprietary products and may subsequently face uncertainty concerning disclosure, distribution, or source-code obligations. The article also examines the role of software supply chains, automated dependency management, and third-party code repositories in increasing the difficulty of identifying applicable licensing conditions. Comparative analysis demonstrates that courts and legal systems continue to develop different approaches to the interpretation and enforceability of open-source licenses. The article argues that open-source licensing should be understood not as a departure from intellectual property law but as a contractual and licensing mechanism operating within the framework of intellectual property rights. It proposes stronger compliance practices based upon software inventories, automated license identification, developer education, and standardized corporate governance procedures.

Article Details

Section
Original Research Articles